Friday, August 7, 2009

Cash for Clunkers: A Numbers Game

If you listen to the Obama Administration, the Cash for Clunkers program is producing better than expected mileage savings. However, when Edmunds.com, an independent group, actually surveyed the auto dealerships to find out what cars were be sold and in what volumes, Edmund's survey produce a list that was out of sync with what Obama's people are reporting. In fact, there were more lower-mileage trucks and SUV's populating Edmund's top-10 lists than all those gas-miserly mini-cars that "supposedly" appear on the government's list (Click to See Full Story).

The government list is as follows:
  1. Ford Focus
  2. Honda Civic
  3. Toyota Corolla
  4. Toyota Prius
  5. Ford Escape
  6. Toyota Camry
  7. Dodge Caliber
  8. Hyundai Elantra
  9. Honda Fit
  10. Chevy Cobalt


The Edmund's list has an SUV on top with some other less fuel-efficient trucks/SUVs like the Ford F-150, Jeep Patriot, and the Chevy Silverado that don't even appear on the government list:
  1. Ford Escape
  2. Ford Focus
  3. Jeep Patriot
  4. Dodge Caliber
  5. Ford F-150
  6. Honda Civic
  7. Chevrolet Silverado
  8. Chevrolet Cobalt
  9. Toyota Corrolla
  10. Ford Fusion
It just seems like we can never get the straight scoop from this new "transparent" government of Barack Obama. Nothing that they have done seems to add up and they are continually being proven to be wrong. They managed to get another $2 billion from the Senate for the "Clunkers" program because it was wrongly assumed that the program was producing fantastic mileage results. But, once again, that appears to be false. Those who have asked for specific details about the program have been turned down; and, now, we can assume why! (Click to See AP Story: "Obama administration withholds data on clunkers")

From the Stimulus Package to the lies about their health care intentions, Obama and his people are increasing becoming untrustworthy on almost everything that they either say or do. It just seems like everything is being manipulated for the best possible political impact; and, the hell with the truth! If they can't even tell the truth about a $3 billion dollar program, what makes you think they are telling the truth about a trillion dollar one?

No comments: